This review synthesizes the evolution of weed detection methods and proposes a crop-guided approach for improved accuracy in precision agriculture.
Weeds remain one of the primary constraints on crop productivity, making accurate detection and spatial localization essential for precision weeding systems. Over the past decades, weed detection has evolved from traditional feature-based image processing to deep learning-driven visual recognition, substantially improving detection accuracy under controlled and semi-controlled conditions. However, most existing approaches still follow a weed-centric paradigm in which models are trained to explicitly recognize diverse weed species or weed classes. Such strategies face persistent limitations caused by extreme weed morphological variability, crop-weed similarity, high annotation cost, and spatial-temporal heterogeneity across fields, seasons, and cropping systems. This review therefore reframes weed detection as a broader transition from feature-based vision and direct weed recognition toward crop-guided, context-aware, and decision-oriented intelligence. Specifically, we synthesize the literature from three perspectives: (i) methodological evolution, including handcrafted features, machine learning, deep learning, segmentation, and multimodal sensing; (ii) paradigm transformation, from weed-centric detection to crop-guided inference based on crop structure, crop rows, and non-crop vegetation; and (iii) deployment-oriented integration, including edge devices, latency-accuracy-energy trade-offs, and robotic actuation. We further summarize representative public datasets, method categories, crop-guided studies, and edge-platform reporting requirements. Finally, we outline a decision-aware hybrid framework in which crop-guided perception provides low-latency weed localization, while species-level recognition is conditionally activated when required by herbicide selection, resistance management, or high-risk weed control. This synthesis clarifies both the value and the limitations of crop-guided weed detection and outlines actionable directions for scalable, robust, and field-deployable intelligent weeding systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: