Randomised trial assesses impact of infographic on recruitment rates in clinical trials, suggesting no benefit.
Background Randomised controlled trial recruitment is challenging. Recruitment and informed consent processes require provision of a participant information sheet (PIS). Visual presentation of information, in the form of an infographic, is increasingly utilised, despite limited effectiveness evidence. This Study Within A Trial (SWAT) assessed if a PIS plus an infographic increases recruitment relative to PIS alone. Methods A two-arm cluster randomised SWAT (1:1 allocation ratio at the site level), embedded within the SWHSI-2 trial. The primary outcome was recruitment rate analysed via mixed effects logistic regression using minimisation factors as fixed effects and site as a random effect. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of participants screened but not recruited, retention rate, and cost. Results All 29 SWHSI-2 sites were randomised to the SWAT (14 intervention; 15 control). Following SWAT implementation, 1634 patients were screened, with 1068 patients eligible (PIS plus infographic, 662/1008 [65.7%]; PIS only, 406/626 [64.9%]) and 585 randomised into the SWHSI-2 trial (PIS plus infographic, 342/662 [51.7%]; PIS only, 243/406 [59.9%]; (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.62, p = 0.32). More patients were screened but not randomised in the intervention group compared to the control group ( n = 666, 66.1% vs n = 383, 61.2%). Meta-analysis of two studies found the infographic intervention reduced participant recruitment (OR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.23). Conclusion Two SWAT replications have found that including an infographic alongside a PIS does not increase participant recruitment, but estimates were imprecise. Replications in other populations and exploration of infographic content and design remain warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arundel et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: