Randomized trial assesses GHI model performance in tropical areas, highlighting model selection implications.
Accurate and spatially representative estimation of Global Horizontal Irradiance (GHI) is critical for solar energy planning in tropical regions characterized by strong atmospheric variability and complex topography. This study aims to evaluate the performance and robustness of four semi-empirical satellite-derived GHI models, Beyer, Perez, Hammer, and Rigollier, under heterogeneous tropical conditions in West Java, Indonesia. Hourly GHI data for 2022 were derived from GK2A satellite observations and validated against ground measurements from eight stations representing coastal, lowland, and mountainous areas. Model performance was assessed at annual and seasonal scales using relative Root Mean Square Error (rRMSE) and relative Mean Bias Error (rMBE). The results show significant variability in model performance across locations, with the average annual rRMSE computed per model and averaged over the eight stations being similar among models: 41.10% (Perez), 41.18% (Beyer), 42.44% (Hammer), and 42.49% (Rigollier). Perez showed the most consistent performance, with station-level rRMSE values ranging from 35.36% to 43.32% and rMBE ranging from −18.20% to 22.09%. Seasonal analysis indicates higher errors during the rainy season, 41.16% (Perez), 45.23% (Beyer), 42.74% (Hammer), and 46.34% (Rigollier), while lower errors were observed during the dry season, particularly for Beyer (36.16%) and Rigollier (36.29%). Spatial analysis indicates higher irradiance in coastal and lowland areas compared to mountainous regions. These findings emphasize the importance of climate- and topography-aware model selection for reliable solar resource assessment in tropical environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Azzahra et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: