Key result
Modern-era Amplatzer Septal Occluder use is linked to ~64% lower post-implant erosion rates.
Why the study?
Trends in cardiac erosion after secundum ASD closure with the Amplatzer Septal Occluder had not been evaluated since Instructions for Use were updated in 2012 and 2018.
Does the era of implantation (post-2012 IFU updates) reduce the rate of cardiac erosion in patients receiving the Amplatzer Septal Occluder for ASD closure?
Population
Reported cardiac erosions after ASO ASD closure from 1996 to 2024
Comparison
Implantation era 1996 to 2012 vs 2013 to 2024
Design
Retrospective surveillance and registry-based trend analysis
Authors
Loading...
Supports refined ASD patient selection for ASO; leaves open whether IFU revisions directly reduced erosions.
Observational (n=500,000)
Yes
Does the era of implantation (post-2012 IFU updates) reduce the rate of cardiac erosion in patients receiving the Amplatzer Septal Occluder for ASD closure?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.02% vs 0.056%
p-value: p=<0.001
Cardiac erosion rates after ASO implantation have significantly decreased since 2012, likely reflecting changes in physician practice and patient selection following updated instructions for use.
Levi et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Secundum atrial septal defect (n=500,000). Amplatzer Septal Occluder (ASO) implantation (2013-2024 era) vs. Amplatzer Septal Occluder (ASO) implantation (1996-2012 era) was evaluated on Overall erosion rate (p=<0.001). The overall erosion rate after Amplatzer Septal Occluder implantation decreased significantly from 0.056% in the 1996-2012 era to 0.020% in the 2013-2024 era (p < 0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: