Demonstrates improved cross-modality segmentation in medical imaging, indicating potential for better patient outcomes.
Unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) transfers knowledge from a labeled source domain to an unlabeled target domain and is particularly valuable in medical imaging, where dense annotations are costly and acquisition conditions vary. Cross-modality segmentation remains challenging because modality-dependent intensity and texture shifts alter image appearance, while teacher-generated pseudo-labels are often unreliable near anatomical boundaries. We propose a fractional texture-guided and boundary-aware perturbation-learning framework within a student–teacher scheme. On the source side, soft histogram transfer introduces target-related low-order intensity shifts. A multi-order fractional Gram discrepancy between shallow features of the intensity-transferred source and target images then provides a gradient signal for generating magnitude-normalized, range-clipped perturbations. This discrepancy is used as a perturbation cue rather than a direct alignment loss, exposing the student to target-relevant texture and edge-transition variation while preserving source annotations. On the target side, teacher logits are perturbed only within predicted boundary bands to model local contour uncertainty. Box-counting fractal boundary complexity guides the boundary-band width and logit perturbation scale and, together with predictive entropy, regulates pseudo-label supervision. Across five adaptation tasks, the proposed method achieves three-seed mean ± standard deviation Dice scores of 89.24 ± 0.12% and 82.01 ± 0.10% for cardiac MR→CT and CT→MR, 88.65 ± 0.29% and 90.43 ± 0.22% for abdominal MR→CT and CT→MR, and 84.76 ± 0.25% for bSSFP→LGE adaptation. Within the protocol-aware benchmark comparisons, the proposed method attains the highest average Dice score on four of the five tasks and is within 0.07 percentage points of the highest reported value on abdominal CT→MR. Ablation and operator-replacement studies further indicate that the source- and target-side pathways provide complementary benefits. Because all auxiliary perturbation and reliability-weighting modules are used only during adaptation, deployment requires only the adapted segmentation network, without additional inference-time modules or parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: