Epistemological critique reveals limits of pragmatism in quantum gravity frameworks, highlighting unverified methodologies.
An Epistemological Critique of Instrumentalism in Post-Empirical Quantum Gravity. This paper introduces a novel conceptual framework—the "Fork-Screwdriver Dilemma"—to evaluate the limits of scientific pragmatism within contemporary theoretical physics. Using the AdS/CFT correspondence as a primary case study, we argue that the modern physics community increasingly relies on mathematical models constructed within highly idealized, unverified environments [phys.org/news/2023-12-strangest-coincidence-physics-adscft-correspondence.html]. When these incomplete frameworks successfully solve isolated quantum equations on paper, an instrumentalist fallacy occurs: a temporary pragmatic shortcut is retroactively re-defined as a literal physical law. By analyzing this structural transition, this paper exposes how contemporary "mapmakers" utilize mathematical beauty to systematically avoid a fundamental cosmic reality: our current equations lack the necessary variables to accurately unify 2D holographic data with real-world 3D space-time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert Morales (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: