Cohort study assesses pain prevalence and impact of chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer, suggesting need for proactive management.
Pain is a major concern in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, significantly affecting quality of life, treatment tolerance, and end-of-life experience. However, data on its prevalence, course, and determinants remain limited, particularly regarding the dynamics of pain as a primary outcome in real-world patient populations. This nationwide cohort study, conducted within the PACAP-PROM registry (2016-2023), included patients with locally advanced (LAPC) or metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). Pain was assessed using 5 items from the EORTC QLQ-C30, PAN26, and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires, with the primary outcome being pain prevalence at baseline and comparisons between LAPC and mPC. Secondary outcomes included pain trajectories over 3 to 18 months and the association between chemotherapy and pain, evaluated using mixed-effects logistic regression. Overall, 794 patients were included, of whom 648 (82%) received cancer therapy, and 146 (18%) received best supportive care (BSC). At baseline, 54% to 78% of patients reported pain, with no differences between LAPC and mPC. Although pain prevalence decreased at 3 months, variable patterns developed thereafter. Patients receiving BSC reported more pain (57% vs 38%, P = 0.029) and greater pain-related interference with daily activities (53% vs 38%, P = 0.024). Chemotherapy was independently associated with lower odds of higher pain severity categories for current pain (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.37-0.70) and pain interference (OR 0.44; 95% CI 0.31-0.63). In conclusion, pain prevalence exceeds 50% in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and remains a key concern that can be positively influenced by chemotherapy. These findings emphasize the need for routine pain assessment and individualized symptom management from diagnosis onward.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diepen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: