Randomized trial analyzes food-web structure in fish, indicating shifts in carbon pathways during seasonal changes.
Seasonal hydrology reshapes large-river food webs by altering habitat connectivity and basal resource availability. Trophic baselines from before the 2021 Yangtze ten-year fishing ban are now valuable because monitoring has shifted from fish abundance alone toward food-web function and ecological recovery. We analysed carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) stable isotopes of fish and the baseline bivalve Corbicula fluminea collected in March (dry season) and August (wet season) 2016 from the Jingjiang section of the lower Yangtze River. In the dry season, 100 individuals of 27 species were analysed; species mean δ13C ranged from −30.52‰ (Micropercops swinhonis) to −21.19‰ (Aristichthys nobilis) and δ15N from 6.30‰ (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) to 14.90‰ (Lophiogobius ocellicauda). In the wet season, 187 individuals of 47 species were analysed; species mean δ13C ranged from −32.07‰ (Pseudobrama simoni) to −20.84‰ (Salanx ariakensis) and δ15N from 6.27‰ (Misgurnus anguillicaudatus) to 14.87‰ (Saurogobio gymnocheilus). Among 24 shared species, δ13C differed significantly between seasons (paired t = 4.30, p < 0.001), but δ15N did not (t = 1.52, p = 0.143). Mean trophic level fell from 3.07 to 2.74 (t = 3.85, p < 0.001). This decline remained significant in a trophic-enrichment-factor sensitivity analysis using 2.5–4.0‰. Community-wide carbon range (CR), nitrogen range (NR), total convex-hull area (TA), mean nearest-neighbour distance (NND), and the standard deviation of nearest-neighbour distance (SDNND) showed larger wet-season CR (9.08 vs. 7.51), slightly larger NR, TA and NND, and lower SDNND. Seasonal hydrology thus mainly altered basal carbon pathways and relative trophic positions rather than reorganising feeding guilds. The dataset provides a pre-ban isotopic baseline for assessing whether post-ban recovery in the lower Yangtze includes restoration of trophic structure and energy-flow pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: