Randomized trial investigates ISG15's role in reducing epithelial resistance to Candida albicans infection, indicating potential therapeutic targets.
Vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) is one of the most common fungal infections, affecting women in their reproductive years. A core characteristic of VVC is the interplay between C. albicans pathogenicity and dysregulated innate immune responses. While these inflammatory responses generally underlie VVC severity, epithelial type I interferon (IFN) responses have been associated with improved epithelial resistance to infection and dampened downstream neutrophil activation. Yet, the role of interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) in epithelial resistance to C. albicans infection remain unclear. Here, we investigated the threshold for mounting type I IFN responses in A-431 vulvovaginal epithelial cells (VECs), and the role of Interferon-stimulated gene 15 (ISG15) in epithelial resistance and inflammation. We found that increasing C. albicans burdens, corresponded to increasing epithelial cytotoxicity and the release of neutrophil chemoattractant IL- 8. Further, expression of IFNB1 and ISGs, specifically ISG15 and MX2, was induced at fungal burdens, prior to the induction of significant cytotoxicity at later time points. We observed intracellular ISG15 accumulation following C. albicans infection, yet detected reduced unconjugated intracellular ISG15, suggesting its conjugation to other proteins. Mechanistically, we show that ISG15 silencing reduced epithelial cytotoxicity and IL-8 responses to C. albicans infection. Concurrently, a C. albicans infection-specific downregulation of the gene encoding the cell death regulator Z-DNA binding protein 1 (ZBP1) was observed. Accordingly, ZBP1 silencing, similar to ISG15, exhibited reduced tissue damage and IL-8 responses. Collectively, our data suggest that ISG15, expressed by VECs upon C. albicans infection, may exert negative feedback on epithelial resistance to infection induced by type I IFNs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schuchardt et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: