Key result
Higher central to peripheral pulse pressure amplification is linked to ~24% lower total mortality.
Why the study?
Assessment of pulse indexes may be important for evaluating cardiovascular risk in very elderly frail subjects.
Population
1,126 subjects older than 80 years living in French and Italian nursing homes
Comparison
Predictive value of pulse pressure amplification vs blood pressure levels
Design
Longitudinal cohort study
Follow-up
2-year
Authors
Loading...
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“We may have to reconsider the clinical criteria for treating old frail people for hypertension. This is of major interest because in this polymedicated subjects (more than seven different drugs per day per person in the PARTAGE study) iatrogenic-induced problems are also a major issue.”
“BP should preferably be evaluated at two different arterial sites (namely, central and peripheral), whenever available. The results of this study imply that an individual with a higher central BP is at higher risk of cardiovascular disease than an individual with a lower central BP, even if both individuals have an identical brachial BP.”
May support pulse pressure amplification monitoring in nursing home residents; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
Cohort (n=1,126)
Yes
Effect estimate: 24% decrease
p-value: p=<0.0003
Bénétos et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Very elderly frail subjects (n=1,126). Central to peripheral pulse pressure amplification (PPA) was evaluated on Overall mortality (24% decrease, p=<0.0003). A 10% increase in central to peripheral pulse pressure amplification was associated with a 24% decrease in total mortality (P<0.0003) and a 17% decrease in major cardiovascular events (P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: