Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This mixed-methods study adopts a longitudinal perspective to investigate whether and how GenAI-supported feedback practice influences students’ writing motivation, feedback literacy, and self-regulated learning (SRL) strategy use, three aspects essential for developing as independent writers. Participants were 61 Chinese undergraduates enrolled in an academic writing program. Quantitative and qualitative findings revealed a differentiated pattern of change across the three domains: writing interest increased, while self-efficacy showed only slight gains; feedback literacy improved in appreciating feedback, managing affect, and taking action, but showed limited improvement in acknowledging feedback sources and making judgments; and SRL strategy use improved in text-generating and revising, with modest gains in planning but a slight decline in self-monitoring. Together, these findings provide nuanced insights into how GenAI-mediated feedback settings can both support and constrain students’ development as independent writers, highlighting the need for pedagogical scaffolding and ethical guidance.
Lu et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: