Randomized trial evaluates a method to optimize domain estimation accuracy using convenience samples, suggesting improved estimation precision.
Quasi-randomization approaches estimate latent participation probabilities for units from a nonprobability / convenience sample. Estimation of participation probabilities for convenience units allows their combination with units from the randomized survey sample to form a survey-weighted domain estimate. One leverages convenience units for domain estimation under the expectation that estimation precision and bias will improve relative to solely using the survey sample; however, convenience sample units that are very different in their covariate support from the survey sample units may inflate estimation bias or variance. This paper develops a method to threshold or exclude convenience units to minimize the variance of the resulting survey-weighted domain estimator. We compare our thresholding method with other thresholding constructions in a simulation study for two classes of datasets based on the degree of overlap between survey and convenience samples on covariate support. We reveal that excluding convenience units that each express a low probability of appearing in both reference and convenience samples reduces estimation error.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Savitsky et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: