Key result
Interleukin-1 blockade shows favorable safety and signals of efficacy across early-phase heart failure trials.
Why the study?
Inflammation plays a key role in heart failure, but no anti-inflammatory treatments are approved, prompting review of interleukin-1 blockade for HF prevention and treatment.
Does interleukin-1 blockade improve surrogate and clinical outcomes in patients at risk for or diagnosed with heart failure?
Does interleukin-1 blockade improve surrogate and clinical outcomes in patients at risk for or diagnosed with heart failure?
Interleukin-1 inhibition is a promising therapeutic strategy addressing the inflammatory pathophysiology of heart failure, though large-scale confirmatory trials are still required.
Heart failure (HF) is a complex syndrome that remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Abundant evidence suggests inflammation plays a key role in the development and perpetuation of HF, but there are currently no anti-inflammatory treatments approved for use in HF. Interleukin-1, the prototypical proinflammatory cytokine, has been implicated in adverse cardiac remodeling and left ventricular dysfunction. Multiple early phase clinical trials using interleukin-1 blockade in patients at risk for or diagnosed with HF have suggested favorable safety and efficacy in reducing inflammatory biomarkers, as well as positive signals in surrogate and clinical end points. Additional large scale clinical trials are urgently needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of this therapeutic approach specifically in HF. In this narrative review, we discuss current evidence regarding interleukin-1 blockade in the prevention and treatment of HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jafree et al. (2023) conducted a review in Heart Failure. Interleukin-1 blockade was evaluated. Interleukin-1 blockade has shown favorable safety and efficacy in reducing inflammatory biomarkers, with positive signals in surrogate and clinical endpoints in patients at risk for or with heart failure across early phase trials.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: