Key result
Single-lead AI-ECG model matches 12-lead performance with ~0.76 AUC for detecting occult AF.
Why the study?
Because many patients have paroxysmal AF, identifying high-risk patients presenting in sinus rhythm on single-lead ECG may improve the yield of subsequent cardiac monitoring.
Does an AI model combining a single-lead ECG during sinus rhythm with clinical risk factors accurately detect concurrent atrial fibrillation compared to a 12-lead ECG model?
Observational (n=67,395)
No
Does an AI model combining a single-lead ECG during sinus rhythm with clinical risk factors accurately detect concurrent atrial fibrillation compared to a 12-lead ECG model?
An AI model combining a 10-second single-lead ECG during sinus rhythm with six easily extractable clinical risk factors can identify patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation as accurately as a full 12-lead ECG AI model, offering a viable approach for opportunistic screening using wearables.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Single-lead ECG-AI plus risk factors matches 12-lead performance for concurrent AF detection; extends prior models but leaves open prospective validation.
AIMS: Guidelines recommend opportunistic screening for atrial fibrillation (AF), using a 30 s single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) recorded by a wearable device. Since many patients have paroxysmal AF, identification of patients at high risk presenting with sinus rhythm (SR) may increase the yield of subsequent long-term cardiac monitoring. The aim is to evaluate an AI-algorithm trained on 10 s single-lead ECG with or without risk factors to predict AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective study used 13 479 ECGs from AF patients in SR around the time of diagnosis and 53 916 age- and sex-matched control ECGs, augmented with 17 risk factors extracted from electronic health records. AI models were trained and compared using 1- or 12-lead ECGs, with or without risk factors. Model bias was evaluated by age- and sex-stratification of results. Random forest models identified the most relevant risk factors. The single-lead model achieved an area under the curve of 0.74, which increased to 0.76 by adding six risk factors (95% confidence interval: 0.74-0.79). This model matched the performance of a 12-lead model. Results are stable for both sexes, over ages ranging from 40 to 90 years. Out of 17 clinical variables, 6 were sufficient for optimal accuracy of the model: hypertension, heart failure, valvular disease, history of myocardial infarction, age, and sex. CONCLUSION: An AI model using a single-lead SR ECG and six risk factors can identify patients with concurrent AF with similar accuracy as a 12-lead ECG-AI model. An age- and sex-matched data set leads to an unbiased model with consistent predictions across age groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dupulthys et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Atrial Fibrillation (n=67,395). Single-lead ECG AI model with clinical risk factors vs. 12-lead ECG AI model or clinical risk factors alone was evaluated on Area under the ROC curve (AUC) for predicting concurrent atrial fibrillation (AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.74-0.79). An AI model using a 10-second single-lead ECG during sinus rhythm and six clinical risk factors detected concurrent atrial fibrillation with an AUC of 0.76, matching the performance of a 12-lead ECG model.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: