Key result
ACEi/ARBs therapy did not significantly reduce the occurrence of cancer therapy-related cardiomyopathy compared to control in patients receiving anthracyclines (16% vs 24%; RR 0.67).
Why the study?
Anthracyclines can lead to cancer therapy-related cardiomyopathy, but randomized controlled trials evaluating ACEi and ARBs for its primary prevention have yielded mixed results.
Does ACEi or ARB therapy prevent cancer therapy-related cardiomyopathy in patients receiving anthracyclines?
Meta-Analysis (n=1,049)
Does ACEi or ARB therapy prevent cancer therapy-related cardiomyopathy in patients receiving anthracyclines?
ACEi/ARB therapy did not significantly reduce the occurrence of cancer therapy-related cardiomyopathy in patients receiving anthracyclines, though it was associated with favorable changes in LVEF and left ventricular remodeling.
ACEi/ARBs should not be used routinely to prevent anthracycline cardiomyopathy; leaves open possible LVEF and arrhythmia benefits for larger trials.
INTRODUCTION: Anthracyclines treat a myriad of malignancies; however, they are known to lead to cancer therapy-related cardiomyopathy (CTRC). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the role of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in primary prevention of CTRC have yielded mixed results. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Scopus databases was performed to identify RCTs that evaluated outcomes in patients receiving anthracyclines and ACEi or ARBs versus control. The primary outcome was occurrence of CTRC. All data were pooled using a random-effects model. RESULTS: The final analysis included 10 RCTs, with 1049 patients assessed. The weighted follow-up period was 16.8 months. The average age was 43.2 years and 90% were female. Breast cancer (80%) and lymphomas (13%) were the most common malignancies. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with regards to occurrence of CTRC (16% vs 24%; risk ratio (RR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.31, 1.45]). Compared with control, ACEi/ARBs were associated with favorable absolute changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (standardized mean difference (SMD) + 1.20%, 95% CI [0.40, 2.00]), left ventricular end-diastolic volume (SMD - 0.36 mL, 95% CI [- 0.66, - 0.06]), and left ventricular end-systolic volume (SMD - 1.04 mL, 95% CI [- 1.79, - 0.29]). There was also a lower risk of arrhythmias in the ACEi/ARBs group compared to control (1.6% vs 8.0%; RR 0.30, 95% CI [0.10, 0.94]), but no difference in all-cause mortality (2.8% vs 3.2%; RR 0.82, 95% CI [0.26, 2.61]), or heart failure (1.2% vs 7.1%; RR 0.40, 95% CI [0.03, 4.54]). CONCLUSIONS: ACEi/ARBs therapy was not associated with a reduction in CTRC among patients with cancer receiving anthracyclines. However, there were favorable changes in LVEF and left ventricular remodeling with ACEi/ARBs therapy. Further large-scale studies are needed to better understand the potential role of ACEi/ARBs in preventing long-term cardiotoxicity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harmouch et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Cancer therapy-related cardiomyopathy (CTRC) (n=1,049). ACEi or ARBs vs. Control (placebo or no treatment) was evaluated on Occurrence of cancer therapy-related cardiomyopathy (CTRC) (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.31, 1.45, p=0.31). ACEi/ARBs therapy did not significantly reduce the occurrence of cancer therapy-related cardiomyopathy compared to control in patients receiving anthracyclines (16% vs 24%; RR 0.67).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: