Key result
Accumulating evidence suggests that vagus-nerve stimulation and trigeminal nerve stimulation share multiple levels and mechanisms of action in the central nervous system.
Noninvasive auricular-nerve stimulation may reproduce the therapeutic effects of invasive vagus and trigeminal nerve stimulation by sharing mechanisms of action in the central nervous system.
May support auricular stimulation trials as noninvasive alternative; leaves open confirmation of equivalent clinical efficacy.
Introduction: Stimulation of cranial nerves modulates central nervous system (CNS) activity via the extensive connections of their brainstem nuclei to higher-order structures. Clinical experience with vagus-nerve stimulation (VNS) demonstrates that it produces robust therapeutic effects, however, posing concerns related to its invasiveness and side-effects. Discussion: Trigeminal nerve stimulation (TNS) has been recently proposed as a valid alternative to VNS. The ear presents afferent vagus and trigeminal-nerve distribution; its innervation is the theoretical basis of different reflex therapies, including auriculotherapy. An increasing number of studies have shown that several therapeutic effects induced by invasive VNS and TNS, can be reproduced by noninvasive auricular-nerve stimulation. However, the sites and neurobiologic mechanisms by which VNS and TNS produce their therapeutic effects are not clear yet. Conclusions: Accumulating evidence suggests that VNS and TNS share multiple levels and mechanisms of action in the CNS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mercante et al. (2018) reported a review. Auricular stimulation was evaluated. Accumulating evidence suggests that vagus-nerve stimulation and trigeminal nerve stimulation share multiple levels and mechanisms of action in the central nervous system.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: