Key result
Doppler deceleration time <180 ms perfectly predicts elevated LA pressure in LV systolic dysfunction.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether Doppler-derived mitral flow velocity curves used to predict left ventricular filling pressures in one disease entity are valid across other disease states.
Population
42 patients with LV systolic dysfunction and 55 with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
Comparison
Simultaneous Doppler echocardiography vs cardiac catheterization pressure measurements
Design
Simultaneous Doppler echocardiographic and cardiac catheterization study
Authors
Loading...
Noninvasive Doppler estimates may aid filling pressure assessment in cardiomyopathies; leaves open larger validation trials before practice change.
Observational (n=97)
Effect estimate: r = 0.73
p-value: p=< 0.001
Nishimura et al. (1996) conducted an observational in Cardiomyopathies (left ventricular systolic dysfunction and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy) (n=97). Doppler echocardiography vs. Cardiac catheterization was evaluated on Correlation between deceleration time and mean left atrial pressure in left ventricular systolic dysfunction (r = 0.73, p=< 0.001). Doppler echocardiographic deceleration time <180 m/s predicted a mean left atrial pressure ≥20 mm Hg with 100% sensitivity and specificity in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: