Case report reveals acute cardiac tamponade caused by contrast extravasation in a patient with a central venous device, implying urgent recognition and intervention.
Background:Cardiac tamponade caused by intrapericardial contrast extravasation is a rare but life-threatening iatrogenic complication associated with central venous access devices (CVADs) during power injection.CVADs, including implanted ports (port-a-caths), are susceptible to fibrin sheath formation and mural thrombosis over time, which can tether the catheter tip against the vessel wall and predispose it to erosion or perforation.When high-pressure contrast is injected through a compromised device, contrast may bypass the vessel lumen entirely and accumulate within the pericardial sac, producing acute obstructive shock. Case Report:We report a 61-year-old woman with a history of diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular accident, and an indwelling port-a-cath who underwent computed tomography (CT) angiography because of difficult peripheral venous access.Immediately after contrast administration, she developed sudden cardiovascular collapse and cardiac arrest.CT imaging demonstrated a large hyperdense pericardial effusion with superior vena cava thrombosis adjacent to the catheter tip, suggesting catheter-related vessel wall injury and direct contrast extravasation into the pericardial sac.Bedside echocardiography confirmed tamponade physiology with right ventricular diastolic collapse and chamber compression.Emergent pericardiocentesis drained 1 L of contrast-containing serosanguinous fluid and resulted in immediate hemodynamic recovery after cardiac arrest. Conclusions:Contrast extravasation through a long-term indwelling port-a-cath is a rare but catastrophic cause of acute cardiac tamponade.Sudden cardiovascular collapse during or after contrast-enhanced CT in a patient with a long-term central venous device should prompt immediate suspicion for this diagnosis.Additionally, echocardiography enables rapid confirmation, and emergent pericardiocentesis is life-saving.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Janjua et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: