Examines repaglinide and piperine effects on glycemic control in diabetic rats, suggesting improved treatment options.
Background: Combination therapies are often needed to achieve optimal glycemic control and improve INS sensitivity in DM management. An INS secretagogue, RPG, and a natural bioactive phenolic compound with multifunctional pharmacological roles, PIP, have been tested with encouraging results in diabetic patients individually. This study examined the synergistic effects of combination therapy in STZ-induced diabetic rats. Materials and Methods: Normal rats were kept as control (vehicle) and STZ-induced diabetic rats were divided into four groups, namely, control (vehicle), RPG-treated, PIP-treated, and a combination of RPG and PIP. Single and multiple doses were administered for a certain period. Blood glucose level, INS secretion, HOMA-IR, C-peptide level, and glucagon level were the key parameters measured in this study. Pancreatic histopathology was also performed to check the status of β-cell integrity. Results and Discussion: The administration of RPG combined with PIP led to a significant decrease in blood glucose levels and a proportional rise in INS production compared to the groups receiving individual treatment. Combined therapy also increased INS sensitivity, as reflected by lower HOMA-IR scores. Moreover, in the combination group, C-peptide levels were higher, while glucagon levels were lower, reflecting an improvement in the overall glycemic profile. Histopathological examination showed that combination therapy preserved more intact β-cell architecture than either treatment alone, hence protecting pancreatic function. Conclusion: The combination of RPG and PIP is more effective in enhancing glycemic control and INS sensitivity in STZ-induced diabetic rats than either agent alone. These findings suggest that combination therapy could be a novel approach toward managing DM and thus might improve clinical outcomes in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patyar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: