Abstract Background Accurate estimation of lesion-specific effective half-life (T eff ) is essential for patient-specific dosimetry in radioiodine (I-131) therapy for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Although conventional multi-timepoint imaging provides detailed kinetic information, it is often impractical for routine clinical implementation. This study prospectively evaluated a simplified dual-timepoint planar imaging protocol aimed at balancing quantitative reliability with clinical feasibility. Methods Fifty patients with DTC undergoing I-131 therapy were prospectively analyzed. Whole-body planar images were acquired twice after administration: an early scan at 1.98–3.25 days (mean, 2.71 days) and a delayed scan at 8.97–17.16 days (interval between the two scans ranged from 6.18 to 14.28 days mean, 12.35 days). Lesion-specific T eff values were calculated assuming mono-exponential clearance between the two scans using a log-linear approximation of measured activity counts. Quantitative reproducibility was assessed by comparing activity–count calibration slopes derived from an internal reference I-131 capsule between independent imaging sessions. Results The mean T eff was 2.16 ± 0.56 days and 3.11 ± 0.74 days for thyroid bed ( n = 35) and metastatic ( n = 19; p < 0.001) lesions, respectively. Among metastatic sites, bone and lung metastases showed numerically similar T eff values (3.22 ± 0.76 and 3.36 ± 0.80 days, respectively); however, this subgroup comparison was limited by the small sample size. Calibration slopes derived from the internal reference capsule demonstrated only 5.0% inter-session variability, indicating high quantitative reproducibility. Conclusions Dual-timepoint planar imaging incorporating internal capsule calibration enables reproducible estimation of lesion-specific T eff in patients undergoing I-131 therapy for DTC. This approach achieves a practical balance between quantitative accuracy and clinical feasibility, enabling reliable characterization of iodine kinetics with minimal imaging burden and supporting individualized dosimetry in routine clinical practice.
Iizuka et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: