Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines growth hormone efficacy in children with persistent short stature, suggesting new treatment directions.
Children born small for gestational age (SGA) account for approximately 5% of the newborn population. Although most experience spontaneous catch-up growth during early childhood, up to 10% remain short beyond 2–4 years of age and are classified as having SGA with persistent short stature (SGA-SS). Recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) has been approved for the treatment of SGA-SS for more than two decades, and numerous clinical trials and real-world observational studies have confirmed its efficacy in improving childhood growth and adult height. However, treatment response is highly variable and likely reflects the heterogeneous aetiology of SGA-SS, ranging from intrauterine environmental influences to genetic and epigenetic determinants of growth. Over the past 40 years, large international drug-specific registry programs (KIGS, GeNeSIS, NordiNet IOS, ANSWER, PATRO, NCGS, and ECOS) have provided invaluable data on the long-term safety and efficacy of individual rhGH therapies, including thousands of patients with SGA-SS and extended follow-up. Safety outcomes across registries consistently demonstrate a low incidence of serious adverse events, with no excess metabolic or oncological risk compared with background population rates. With the increasing availability of next-generation sequencing, genetic diagnoses can now be identified in a substantial proportion of children with SGA-SS, opening new avenues for stratified treatment approaches. Future research should focus on defining genotype-specific growth responses, optimizing treatment regimens, and integrating next-generation patient databases such as GloBE-Reg to enhance long-term surveillance in the era of conventional and long-acting GH preparations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samvelyan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: