Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates the effectiveness of land value capture in funding London's transport infrastructure, suggesting important implications for urban redevelopment.
Global cities are increasingly developing large transport infrastructure projects to maintain their competitive advantage, but funding these projects is challenging. Land value capture (LVC), which harvests financial contributions from property development, has become one means of providing some of this funding. LVC is however a complicated proposition to utilise and requires careful decision making to ensure sufficient revenue is appropriately raised without hampering efforts by the development industry to bring forward new schemes, or local, borough authorities can extract revenue to pay for their own infrastructure needs like affordable housing. London's Crossrail has made extensive use of LVC funding through MCIL (the Mayoral Community Infrastructure Levy) which has to date raised over £1b of funds. In this paper, we critically identify the extent to which MCIL has been successful, drawing on Marsh and McConnell's (2010) framework on the different ways projects can be considered a success.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: