Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Commentary identifies gaps in attentional pragmatics for exhaustification insights, suggesting amendments.
As a puzzle for the Gricean view of exhaustification, Fox (2014) describes a game show scenario where the maxim of Quantity is arguably canceled, but the use of a disjunctive sentence still invites an exclusivity inference. Westera (2022) proposes that this puzzle can be solved in an Attentional Pragmatics, where the Gricean maxims are supplemented with Attention-maxims. In this commentary, we identify a gap in Westera’s solution and propose two possible amendments. We point out that under either amendment, the resulting proposal requires a departure from Grice’s original view of exhaustification as arising from a clash between the maxims of Quantity and Quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zumchak et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: