Randomized trial demonstrates improved RGB-T object detection performance in challenging visibility conditions, suggesting enhanced adaptability.
Object detection in real-world settings frequently suffers from low-visibility challenges, such as backlighting, rain, snow, and occlusion as well as large variations in object scale. To address these issues, we present a novel Multi-scale Enhanced Cross-Modal Adaptive Fusion Network for RGB-T object detection, called CMAF-Net, which improves cross-modal fusion, multi-scale contextual modeling, detection head design, and localization loss optimization. In this framework, an Adaptive Gated Fusion Module (AGFM) is introduced at the mid-level fusion stage to strengthen the information exchange and complementary representation between the visible and infrared branches. In addition, a Multi-scale Contextual Attention Fusion module (MCAF) is used to strengthen multi-scale contextual modeling. An Adaptive Multi-scale Fusion Head (AMFH) is also designed to adaptively aggregate features across different scales, thereby improving detection performance for objects of varying sizes. During training, a Dynamic Weighted Intersection-over-Union loss (DW-IoU) is introduced to optimize bounding box regression, improving localization stability and regression accuracy for samples of varying quality through dynamic focusing and center-distance constraints. To validate the model’s performance, systematic experiments were conducted on three datasets: M3FD, LLVIP and VEDAI. The results demonstrate that CMAF-Net exhibits superior performance compared to other state-of-the-art object detection methods while maintaining a good balance between detection accuracy and computational cost. The experimental results also indicate that CMAF-Net can preserve robust detection capability in difficult scenarios, including rainy, foggy, and cluttered environments, exhibiting good environmental adaptability and robustness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: