Why the study?
Evidence comparing apixaban and warfarin in patients with kidney failure receiving peritoneal dialysis is limited.
Does apixaban reduce thromboembolic events and bleeding compared to warfarin in peritoneal dialysis patients with newly diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Comparison
Apixaban vs warfarin initiated within 30 days after NVAF diagnosis
Design
Retrospective propensity-matched cohort study using the US Renal Data System
Key result
In peritoneal dialysis patients with newly-diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, apixaban showed similar risks of ischemic stroke (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.42-2.01) compared to warfarin.
Authors
Loading...
Comparable outcomes with apixaban and warfarin in PD patients with NVAF; leaves open optimal choice pending randomized trials.
Cohort (n=6,571)
Yes
Does apixaban reduce thromboembolic events and bleeding compared to warfarin in peritoneal dialysis patients with newly diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Hazard Ratio: 0.92 (95% CI 0.42–2.01)
In peritoneal dialysis patients with newly diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, apixaban and warfarin have similar safety and effectiveness profiles, suggesting apixaban is a practical alternative.
He et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in peritoneal dialysis patients (n=6,571). Apixaban vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Ischemic stroke (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.42-2.01). In peritoneal dialysis patients with newly-diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, apixaban showed similar risks of ischemic stroke (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.42-2.01) compared to warfarin.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: