Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Narrative review explores neuroinflammation and its role in neurodegeneration, suggesting new therapeutic strategies.
Neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental neurological disorders represent a growing global health burden, characterized by progressive neuronal dysfunction, cognitive decline, and impaired functional outcomes. Increasing evidence highlights neuroinflammation as a central pathophysiological mechanism linking mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, microbiota dysbiosis, and synaptic impairment across diverse neurological conditions. This narrative review was conducted using a structured literature search approach, incorporating major biomedical databases to enhance transparency and reproducibility. This review synthesizes contemporary evidence on mechanistic pathways underlying neuroinflammation-mediated neurodegeneration and critically evaluates emerging neuroprotective therapeutic strategies. Particular emphasis is placed on mitochondrial transfer approaches, novel circulating and imaging biomarkers, and integrative neurotechnological innovations such as artificial intelligence-driven neuroimaging analytics. While several therapeutic approaches demonstrate promise in preclinical models, most remain at early experimental or translational stages, with limited validation in large-scale human studies. Current findings suggest that targeting neuroimmune signaling cascades, restoring mitochondrial bioenergetics, and modulating gut-brain axis interactions may provide synergistic neuroprotective benefits. The review proposes a multidimensional precision-medicine framework incorporating biomarker-guided therapeutic selection and interdisciplinary care models. Future research priorities include longitudinal biomarker validation, randomized clinical trials of mitochondrial-based therapies, and integration of digital neurodiagnostic platforms to enhance early disease detection. Despite these advances, significant gaps remain in clinical translation, standardization of biomarkers, and long-term therapeutic safety, necessitating cautious interpretation of emerging evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hammad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: