Key result
Real-world dapagliflozin discontinuation reaches ~13 per 100 patient-years in HFrEF, alongside declining quadruple GDMT.
Why the study?
Adherence to guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction in the Baltics was unknown.
Cohort (n=178)
Yes
Real-world data from the Baltic region reveals suboptimal implementation of guideline-directed medical therapy in HFrEF patients, with less than half receiving quadruple therapy despite a high-risk clinical profile.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observed dapagliflozin discontinuation and GDMT decline in HFrEF highlight implementation gaps; leaves open whether targeted strategies can improve persistence.
Background and Objectives: Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) remains a challenge due to its low rates worldwide. Adherence to GDMT in patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (rEF) in the Baltics (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania) has been unknown. This is the first study to describe the characteristics of patients with HFrEF and their treatment patterns in the Baltics. Materials and Methods: The EVOLUTION-HF study was a longitudinal, real-world evidence study that enrolled patients with HFrEF following newly initiated sodium–glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) dapagliflozin therapy. In total, 12 study sites (four from each country) were included. Patients were followed up for 12 months. A pooled data set including adherence to GDMT, dapagliflozin’s usage, and patients’ profiles was evaluated. Results: Between April and December 2022, 178 patients with a median left ventricular ejection fraction of 32% were enrolled. At baseline, 155 (87%) patients received renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi), 168 (94%) received beta-blockers (BB), and 106 (60%) received mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA); however, only 47.8% of the study population were found to be treated with GDMT (including RAASi, BB, MRA, and dapagliflozin) at the beginning of the study. At the end of the follow-up, the percentage of GDMT users decreased to 42.3%. The number of dapagliflozin discontinuations per 100 patient-years was found to be 13.2 (95% CI 8.2–18.2). Conclusions: The findings indicate a low rate of dapagliflozin discontinuation (13%) and an overall suboptimal proportion of patients receiving GDMT for HFrEF (almost half of the patients). The low rate of GDMT use in the Baltics prompts great attention. Additional research and incremental joint efforts are needed to ensure an increase in GDMT use across diverse HF patient populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Žaliaduonytė et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) (n=178). Dapagliflozin was evaluated on Dapagliflozin discontinuation rate (13.2 per 100 patient-years, 95% CI 8.2-18.2). In a real-world Baltic cohort of patients with HFrEF, the dapagliflozin discontinuation rate was 13.2 per 100 patient-years, and quadruple GDMT use declined from 47.8% at baseline to 42.3% at 12 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: