Study predicts efficiency in rural dwellings, suggesting ML can optimize heating systems.
Given the heterogeneity in data on heat pump performance curves across manufacturers, selecting the appropriate one for more detailed studies is complex. Machine learning (ML) techniques can be very helpful in this endeavor. In this case, four techniques were used: artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), Gaussian Process (GP), and decision trees (DT), to predict HP performance maps. These four techniques were then applied to a hybrid installation consisting of an air-water HP boiler and a biomass boiler modeled with TRNSYS and connected in series. Performance maps were generated using TRNSYS type 581. Key aspects, including overall efficiency, emissions, lifetime costs, and design and control parameters, were then analyzed. The study found that the coefficient of variation of root-mean-square error (CVRMSE) was 14.9% for the DT model, 11.4% for the ANN, 11.1% for the SVM, and 10.7% for the GP model. The GP model was ultimately used to develop an HP performance map due to its highest accuracy, and comparisons with baseline data revealed significant differences in efficiency, operational costs, and emissions, among others.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Uche et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: