Key result
Vibroacoustic stimulation fails to significantly lower systolic blood pressure compared to rest in hypertension.
Why the study?
Non-pharmacological treatments like music therapy show benefits in hypertension, but evidence on the impact of vibroacoustic stimulation remains limited.
Does vibroacoustic stimulation reduce blood pressure and stress-related parameters in male adults with mild to moderate hypertension?
Does vibroacoustic stimulation reduce blood pressure and stress-related parameters in male adults with mild to moderate hypertension?
Absolute Event Rate: -8.09% vs -5.64%
p-value: p=0.377
Vibroacoustic stimulation is a feasible intervention that showed a non-significant trend toward reducing blood pressure and stress parameters in men with mild-to-moderate hypertension, warranting larger trials.
No BP benefit in this small pilot; leaves open efficacy for larger randomized trials in hypertension.
BACKGROUND: Arterial hypertension is a frequent condition, affecting up to one-quarter of the global adult population. Both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments are recommended for hypertension management. Among the latter, recent studies have shown the positive effects of music therapy; however, evidence on the impact of vibroacoustic stimulation (VAS) is still limited. OBJECTIVE: This pilot study aimed to explore the feasibility and effects of a VAS intervention on blood pressure (BP) and other cardiopulmonary and stress-related parameters in patients with hypertension. METHODS: A pilot single-sequence cross-over experimental study was conducted on 11 male adults with mild to moderate hypertension. Patients underwent two sessions: on Day 1, they lay for 30 min without any vibratory or musical stimuli. On Day 2, they were placed on the vibroacoustic bed delivering 40 Hz vibration for 30 min, followed by 7 min of vibration combined with relaxing music. Physiological and stress-related parameters were measured at multiple time points during both sessions. RESULTS: Preliminary analysis showed no statistically significant differences between sessions. However, on Day 2, a more pronounced trend toward reductions in systolic and diastolic BP, heart and respiratory rate, and perceived stress was observed. A higher heart rate variability was recorded on Day 1 compared to Day 2. CONCLUSION: The VAS intervention appears feasible and may influence cardiovascular health parameters. Further studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to confirm these effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saller et al. (2026) studied Mild to moderate hypertension (n=11). Vibroacoustic stimulation (VAS) vs. 30 minutes lying in silence without vibratory or musical stimuli was evaluated on Acute change in systolic blood pressure (p=0.377). Vibroacoustic stimulation resulted in a non-significant reduction in systolic blood pressure (-8.09 mmHg vs -5.64 mmHg, p=0.377) compared to a silent control session in men with mild-to-moderate hypertension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: