Comparative study assesses tax establishment concepts in Italy, the UK, and Germany, suggesting a new OECD protocol.
In this article, the authors assess whether the permanent establishment concept remains appropriate in light of the 2025 Update to the Commentary on Article 5 of the OECD Model. A comparative study of Italy, the United Kingdom and Germany reveals that national systems are incorporating these developments unevenly: Italy balances the expansion of the PE concept with targeted exemptions; the United Kingdom is pursuing a comprehensive post-BEPS alignment; Germany is modernizing its PE definition, although its profit allocation framework has yet to keep pace. The authors advocate the adoption of a dedicated OECD soft law protocol linking social security mobility certification to a proportionate tax nexus assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cotroneo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: