Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative study assesses tax establishment concepts in Italy, the UK, and Germany, suggesting a new OECD protocol.
In this article, the authors assess whether the permanent establishment concept remains appropriate in light of the 2025 Update to the Commentary on Article 5 of the OECD Model. A comparative study of Italy, the United Kingdom and Germany reveals that national systems are incorporating these developments unevenly: Italy balances the expansion of the PE concept with targeted exemptions; the United Kingdom is pursuing a comprehensive post-BEPS alignment; Germany is modernizing its PE definition, although its profit allocation framework has yet to keep pace. The authors advocate the adoption of a dedicated OECD soft law protocol linking social security mobility certification to a proportionate tax nexus assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cotroneo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: