Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper offers a positive answer to the question of what it means to exist: being is the stabilization of translation. Translation is defined as subjectless directed determination — the relation in which the state of one system constrains the state of another, from source to target, without presupposing any describer. Direction is fixed at the level of a single axiom (Axiom T) rather than derived from physical time or from resistance; description and the subject are repositioned as late-arriving special cases of translation, arising once the determining side has itself stabilized into a knower. The correlation between thought and being, which correlationism takes as inescapable, is thereby repositioned as one instance among countless subjectless instances of this same relation, inverting the correlationist circle from within. Translation resistance is defined in information-theoretic terms, relative to a specified state space and probability distribution. It is proved, as a theorem, that for a directed translation, positive resistance is equivalent to the non-recoverability of the source from the target — irreversibility in the reverse direction. A separate, explicitly argued Individuation Principle proposes that only translations with resistance in the open interval 0 < R < 1 individuate a target distinct from its source; the proved theorem and the argued principle are kept carefully distinct. Directed relations are further shown to be unrecoverable from a minimal symmetric concept of difference, so that difference, description, and the subject are derivative rather than primitive — a result that confirms, rather than refutes, the generative concepts of difference found in Deleuze and Derrida. Being is then defined as the temporally extended, perturbation-robust stabilization of a translational pattern within this productive interval. Substance is eliminated, being is shown to admit degrees, and cessation is redefined as collapse rather than annihilation. The paper situates this result relative to Heidegger, process philosophy, Simondon, and object-oriented ontology, and the principles established here ground the Applied Edition of Flovien Theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Makoto Sueyoshi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: