Demonstrates improved localization accuracy in complex marine environments, highlighting better sensor fusion methods.
Accurate and robust localization is essential for intelligent vessels operating in complex marine and port environments. However, single-sensor localization is often affected by limited observation range, environmental occlusion, local interference, and sensor degradation. Although multi-sensor fusion can improve localization reliability, unknown cross-correlated measurement noise arising from shared disturbances, time synchronization errors, communication delays, and inconsistent fusion rates may degrade traditional information-filter-based fusion methods. To address this problem, this paper proposes an Adaptive Correlation Information Filter Network (ACIFNet) for multi-sensor fusion localization of intelligent vessels. ACIFNet preserves the recursive structure of the extended information filter and uses a Transformer-based network to learn adaptive information-domain fusion weights, thereby compensating for unknown inter-sensor correlations without explicitly estimating the full correlation covariance matrix. Experiments on constant-velocity, coordinated-turn (CV), and three-degree-of-freedom vessel motion models, together with a real-world restricted-waterway dataset, demonstrate that ACIFNet achieves higher localization accuracy and stability than Edge Incorporative Fusion (EIF)-inexact fusion, measurement fusion, and KalmanNet. In the CV and three-degree-of-freedom experiments, ACIFNet reduces the mean RMSE by 48.7%, 23.2%, and 26.1%, respectively, compared with KalmanNet. On the real-world dataset, ACIFNet achieves a mean position error of 9.90 m, an RMSE of 11.24 m, and a cross-track error of 8.72 m. These results show that ACIFNet effectively combines the interpretability of information filtering with the adaptive representation capability of neural networks for robust multi-sensor fusion localization under unknown cross-correlated measurement noises.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: