Case study proposes a policy for offender reintegration, emphasizing psychological evaluation and confidentiality.
This paper presents a consolidated, in-depth case study of a proposed criminal-rehabilitation policy theory in India. The framework rests on three linked mechanisms: a mandatory psychological and vocational fitness evaluation near release, conditional confidentiality of criminal records administered by an independent custodian, and a graduated accountability model for repeat offenses. Drawing on Article 21 jurisprudence of the Constitution of India, comparative legal frameworks (UK, US, EU), criminological theory, and labor-economics data, this study analyzes both the strengths and systemic gaps of record concealment. To mitigate risks like statistical discrimination and tool inaccuracies, the paper proposes a revised, offence-tiered institutional model ("Rehabilitation and Reintegration of Offenders Act") to balance offender dignity with public safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ANKIT KUMAR SINGH (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: