Key result
Nurse-led cardiac rehab lowers triglycerides by ~8 mg/dL compared to usual care.
Why the study?
Nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation has been shown to improve the quality of life of cardiac patients, but its effect on lipid levels required evaluation.
Does nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation reduce lipid levels in patients with cardiovascular diseases?
Meta-Analysis
Does nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation reduce lipid levels in patients with cardiovascular diseases?
Mean Difference: -8.38 (95% CI -13.82–-2.94)
Nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation significantly reduces triglyceride levels in patients with cardiovascular disease, supporting its role as an adjunctive lifestyle intervention.
Supports nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation for modest triglyceride reduction in CVD; extends its benefits beyond quality-of-life gains.
Background Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) continue to be the leading cause of death worldwide, with dyslipidemia as one of their main risk factors. Nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation (NLCR) has been shown to improve the quality of life of cardiac patients. We aim to measure its effect on lipid levels. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing NLCR with usual care. Major electronic databases and grey literature sources were searched through July 31, 2025. Eligible studies reported at least one lipid outcome, including triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and ROBINS-I for non-RCTs. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled standardized mean differences (SMDs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis. NLCR was associated with a significant reduction in TG levels (SMD = − 0.19; 95% CI: −0.36 to − 0.02), corresponding to an absolute reduction of 8.38 mg/dL (MD = − 8.38; 95% CI: −13.82 to − 2.94). Changes in TC (MD = − 6.03 mg/dL; 95% CI: −14.57 to 2.51), LDL-C (MD = − 4.78 mg/dL; 95% CI: −9.89 to 0.33), and HDL-C (MD = 1.90 mg/dL; 95% CI: −2.30 to 6.10) did not reach statistical significance in the overall analysis. Subgroup analyses demonstrated a significant TG reduction among RCTs (MD = − 9.25 mg/dL; 95% CI: −14.84 to − 3.65). According to follow-up duration, studies with follow-up durations of ≤ 3 months showed a significant reduction in TC levels (MD = − 9.81 mg/dL; 95% CI: −14.13 to − 5.49), whereas studies with follow-up durations of > 3 months demonstrated a significant reduction in TG levels (MD = − 8.02 mg/dL; 95% CI: −13.95 to − 2.09). Meta-regression analyses identified study design as a significant predictor of TG and LDL changes. Conclusion NLCR was associated with a significant reduction in TG levels among patients with CVD, while changes in TC, LDL-C, and HDL-C were not statistically significant. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses suggested that study design and follow-up duration may influence lipid outcomes. Further high-quality RCTs with longer follow-up are needed to confirm these findings and evaluate their long-term clinical implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) conducted a meta-analysis in Cardiovascular diseases. Nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation vs. Usual care or non-intervention control was evaluated on Triglyceride (TG) levels (MD -8.38 mg/dL, 95% CI -13.82 to -2.94). Nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation significantly reduced triglyceride levels by an absolute mean difference of 8.38 mg/dL compared to usual care in patients with cardiovascular disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: