Key result
Quantitative approaches using Doppler ultrasonography to evaluate fluid responsiveness and tolerance can enhance management decisions in circulatory failure based on the Frank-Starling-Sarnoff framework.
Why the study?
Qualitative, image-based ultrasound algorithms skirt foundational cardiac physiology tenets, and the physiological relationship between Doppler-evaluated fluid responsiveness and tolerance remains nebulous.
Doppler ultrasonography provides a quantitative physiological framework based on the Frank-Starling-Sarnoff relationship to better assess fluid intolerance in critically ill patients compared to qualitative image-based protocols.
May guide fluid management in critical care; leaves open validation in larger trials.
Ultrasonography is becoming the favored hemodynamic monitoring utensil of emergentologists, anesthesiologists and intensivists. While the roles of ultrasound grow and evolve, many clinical applications of ultrasound stem from qualitative, image-based protocols, especially for diagnosing and managing circulatory failure. Often, these algorithms imply or suggest treatment. For example, intravenous fluids are opted for or against based upon ultrasonographic signs of preload and estimation of the left ventricular ejection fraction. Though appealing, image-based algorithms skirt some foundational tenets of cardiac physiology; namely, (1) the relationship between cardiac filling and stroke volume varies considerably in the critically ill, (2) the correlation between cardiac filling and total vascular volume is poor and (3) the ejection fraction is not purely an appraisal of cardiac function but rather a measure of coupling between the ventricle and the arterial load. Therefore, management decisions could be enhanced by quantitative approaches, enabled by Doppler ultrasonography. Both fluid 'responsiveness' and 'tolerance' are evaluated by Doppler ultrasound, but the physiological relationship between these constructs is nebulous. Accordingly, it is argued that the link between them is founded upon the Frank-Starling-Sarnoff relationship and that this framework helps direct future ultrasound protocols, explains seemingly discordant findings and steers new routes of enquiry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jon‐Émile S. Kenny (2022) conducted a review in Circulatory failure in the critically ill. Doppler ultrasonography was evaluated. Quantitative approaches using Doppler ultrasonography to evaluate fluid responsiveness and tolerance can enhance management decisions in circulatory failure based on the Frank-Starling-Sarnoff framework.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: