Key result
Left ventricular ejection fraction was the single independent predictor of cardiovascular events in the overall cohort (HR 0.94), while FPV/E predicted outcomes in patients with mildly depressed systolic function.
Why the study?
Does color M-mode Doppler-derived FPV/E predict cardiovascular events in patients with chronic left ventricular systolic dysfunction?
Cohort (n=98)
No
Does color M-mode Doppler-derived FPV/E predict cardiovascular events in patients with chronic left ventricular systolic dysfunction?
Hazard Ratio: 0.94 (95% CI 0.91–0.97)
p-value: p=<0.001
Color M-mode Doppler-derived FPV/E is a useful prognostic marker for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with mildly depressed left ventricular systolic function.
Diastolic assessment may refine risk stratification when EF ≥0.35; extends prognostic models in chronic systolic dysfunction.
Background. Color M-mode Doppler echocardiography provides accurate evaluation of LV diastolic function noninvasively and is reportedly preload independent compared with pulsed Doppler transmitral velocity indexes. This study aimed to determine the prognostic significance of left ventricular (LV) diastolic function in patients with different degrees of chronic LV systolic dysfunction using color M-mode Doppler echocardiography.Methods. A total of 98 consecutive subjects (mean age 57 years, 78 males) with LV systolic dysfunction (61 with previous myocardial infarction and 37 with dilated cardiomyopathy) underwent clinical and echocardiographic evaluation to determine functional status. Measurements of LV and left atrial dimensions, LV ejection fraction (EF), the peak of early and late diastolic transmitral velocities (E and A, respectively), the E/A ratio, deceleration time of E velocity and isovolumic relaxation time using conventional echo-Doppler techniques, and LV flow propagation velocity (FPV) and FPV/E using color M-mode Doppler echocardiography were taken.Results. During the mean follow-up period of 37±28 months, 26 patients had cardiovascular events (death in 4, congestive heart failure in 13, ventricular tachycardia in 6, and cerebral infarction in 3). EF was the single independent predictor of cardiovascular events. While, in the subgroup with EF <0.35, the functional class was the single significant predictor of cardiovascular events, FPV/E was the single best predictor of cardiovascular events in the subgroup with EF ≥0.35.Conclusions. The evaluation of LV diastolic function using color M-mode Doppler-derived FPV/E contributes to predicting clinical outcomes of patients with mildly depressed LV systolic function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hirao et al. (2004) conducted a cohort in Chronic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (n=98). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) vs. Lower LVEF was evaluated on Cardiovascular events (cardiac death, hospitalization for heart failure, ventricular tachycardia, or cardiogenic cerebral infarction) (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.97, p=<0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction was the single independent predictor of cardiovascular events in the overall cohort (HR 0.94), while FPV/E predicted outcomes in patients with mildly depressed systolic function.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: