Key result
Low socioeconomic status was associated with a 68% higher risk of incident cardiovascular disease at 10 years (OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.12-2.47) and an 86% higher risk of all-cause mortality.
Why the study?
The study was designed to investigate the association between cumulative social disadvantage and cardiovascular disease burden and mortality in the general population.
Does low socioeconomic status increase the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality in the general population?
Cohort (n=15,010)
Does low socioeconomic status increase the risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality in the general population?
Cumulative social disadvantage, specifically lower education and occupation levels, is associated with significantly higher risks of incident cardiovascular disease and mortality despite universal healthcare access.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Social disadvantage links to higher CVD burden despite universal care; leaves open causal pathways for prospective trials.
AIMS: To investigate the association between cumulative social disadvantage and cardiovascular burden and mortality in a large cohort of the general population. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cross-sectional (n = 15 010, aged 35 to 74 years, baseline investigation period 2007 to 2012) and longitudinal data (5- and 10-year follow-ups from 2012 to 2022) from the Gutenberg Health Study were used to investigate the association between individual socioeconomic status (SES, measured via a validated questionnaire) and cardiovascular disease (CVD, composite of atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, chronic heart failure, peripheral artery disease, and/or venous thromboembolism) risk and mortality. Subjects with prevalent CVD had a lower SES sum score, as well as lower education, occupation, and household net-income scores (all P < 0.0001). Logistic regression analysis showed that a low SES (vs. high, defined by validated cut-offs) was associated with 19% higher odds of prevalent CVD [odds ratio (OR) 1.19, 95% CI 1.01; 1.40] in the fully adjusted model. At 5-year follow-up, low SES was associated with both increased cardiovascular [hazard ratio (HR) 5.36, 2.24; 12.82] and all-cause mortality (HR 2.23, 1.51; 3.31). At 10-year follow-up, low SES was associated with a 68% higher risk of incident CVD (OR 1.68, 1.12; 2.47) as well as 86% higher all-cause mortality (HR 1.86, 1.55; 2.24). In general, the education and occupation scores were stronger related to risk of CVD and death than the household net-income score. Low SES was estimated to account for 451.45 disability-adjusted life years per 1000 people (years lived with disability 373.41/1000 and years of life lost 78.03/1000) and an incidence rate of 11 CVD cases and 3.47 CVD deaths per 1000 people per year. The population attributable fraction for CVD incidence after 5 years was 4% due to low SES. CONCLUSION: Despite universal healthcare access, cumulative social disadvantage remains associated with higher risk of CVD and mortality. Dimensions of education and occupation, but not household net income, are associated with outcomes of interest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hahad et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease (n=15,010). Low socioeconomic status vs. High socioeconomic status was evaluated on Incident cardiovascular disease at 10-year follow-up (OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.12-2.47). Low socioeconomic status was associated with a 68% higher risk of incident cardiovascular disease at 10 years (OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.12-2.47) and an 86% higher risk of all-cause mortality.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: