Key result
DE-CMR-guided repeat pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation was associated with greater freedom from recurrences at 2 years compared to conventional 3D-guidance (70% vs 39%, P=0.007).
Why the study?
It was unknown whether using DE-CMR to localize veno-atrial gaps in AF redo ablation procedures improves clinical outcomes during follow-up.
Does DE-CMR-guided repeat pulmonary vein isolation improve freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias compared to conventional 3D-guided procedures in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Case-Control (n=70)
Does DE-CMR-guided repeat pulmonary vein isolation improve freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmias compared to conventional 3D-guided procedures in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Hazard Ratio: 0.36 (95% CI 0.17–0.79)
Absolute Event Rate: 70% vs 39%
p-value: p=0.009
Using delayed enhancement cardiac MRI to guide repeat pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation is associated with shorter procedure times and significantly lower rates of arrhythmia recurrence at 2 years compared to conventional 3D mapping.
DE-CMR guidance may improve repeat AF ablation outcomes; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials before practice change.
AIMS: Our aim was to analyse whether using delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (DE-CMR) to localize veno-atrial gaps in atrial fibrillation (AF) redo ablation procedures improves outcomes during follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a case-control study with 35 consecutive patients undergoing a DE-CMR-guided Repeat-pulmonary vein isolation (Re-PVI) procedure. Those with more extensive ablations (e.g. roof lines, box) were excluded. Patients were matched for age, sex, AF pattern, and left atrial dimension with 35 patients who had undergone a conventional Re-PVI procedure guided with a three dimensional (3D)-navigation system. Procedural characteristics were recorded, and patients were followed for 24 months in a specialized outpatient clinic. The primary endpoint was freedom from recurrent AF, atrial tachycardia, or flutter. The duration of CMR-guided procedures was shorter compared to the conventional group (161 ± 52 vs. 195 ± 72 min, respectively, P = 0.049), with no significant differences in fluoroscopy or total radiofrequency time. At the 2-year follow-up, more patients in the DE-CMR-guided group remained free from recurrences compared with the conventional group (70% vs. 39%, respectively, P = 0.007). In univariate Cox-regression analyses, AF pattern [persistent AF, hazard ratio (HR) 2.66 (1.27-5.46), P = 0.006] and the use of DE-CMR [HR 0.36 (0.17-0.79), P = 0.009] predicted recurrences during follow-up; both factors remained independent predictors in multivariate analyses. CONCLUSION: The substrate characterization provided by DE-CMR facilitates the identification of anatomical veno-atrial gaps and associates with shorter procedures and better clinical outcomes in repeated AF ablation procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quinto et al. (2020) conducted a case-control in Atrial fibrillation undergoing redo ablation (n=70). Delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (DE-CMR)-guided Re-PVI vs. Conventional Re-PVI procedure guided with a 3D-navigation system was evaluated on Freedom from recurrent AF, atrial tachycardia, or flutter (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.17-0.79, p=0.009). DE-CMR-guided repeat pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation was associated with greater freedom from recurrences at 2 years compared to conventional 3D-guidance (70% vs 39%, P=0.007).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: