Demonstrates enhanced frequency conversion in silicon waveguides integrated with TMDs, suggesting new design guidelines.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Integrating 2D materials onto on-chip photonic devices holds significant potential for nonlinear frequency conversion across various applications. The lack of inversion symmetry in monolayers of transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), e.g., MoS 2, is particularly attractive for enabling nonlinear phenomena based on χ (2) in silicon-based photonic devices incorporated with these materials, which has been previously demonstrated. However, reports have largely overlooked the need to consider, in the nonlinear modal interaction, both the tensorial nature of the TMD’s second-order susceptibility and the full vectorial nature of the electromagnetic fields. In this work, we investigate second-harmonic generation (SHG) in silicon nitride (SiN) waveguides integrated with a monolayer of MoS 2 . We experimentally observed an enhancement in SHG in MoS 2 -loaded waveguides compared to those without the monolayer. Notably, this enhancement occurred even when the dominant electric-field component of the pump and/or signal mode was orthogonal to the TMD plane, highlighting co- and cross-polarized SHG interactions. This phenomenon cannot be predicted by the traditionally used scalar models. By taking into account the full vectorial and tensorial natures of the problem, we then designed a waveguide in which a TE pump mode is phase-matched to a TM second-harmonic mode. With a single 110 μm-long MoS 2 flake, we experimentally achieved 14× frequency conversion enhancement relative to the nonphase-matched case and 220× enhancement relative to free-space (normal-incidence) excitation. Our work, thus, introduces fundamental guidelines for the design and optimization of nonlinear silicon photonic devices based on 2D-material hybrid integration. These guidelines are material-independent and may lead to significant further conversion efficiency enhancement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rehan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: