Retrospective study evaluates IOP reduction in refractory uveitic glaucoma patients using PGI, suggesting a beneficial option.
Purpose Evaluate the mid-term efficacy and safety of Paul Glaucoma Implant (PGI) in patients with refractory uveitic glaucoma (RUG).Methods Retrospective, single-center observational study. Patients aged 18 years or older with RUG and uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP) who underwent PGI implantation between November 2021 and January 2025 at a tertiary uveitis center were included. Surgical outcomes were evaluated at 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.Complete success was defined as IOP ≤ 18 mmHg without medications, qualified success as IOP ≤ 18 mmHg with medications, and failure as IOP > 18 mmHg, loss of light perception, or need for new glaucoma surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications, reinterventions, and functional outcomes.Results 25 eyes were included. Mean preoperative IOP was 25.5 ± 7.7 mmHg with 3.5 ± 1.1 medications. At 24 months, mean IOP decreased to 12.2 mmHg with a mean of 1.9 medications. Overall success was maintained in all eyes throughout follow-up. Complete success decreased from 28% at 6 months to 12.5% at 24 months, while qualified success increased from 72% to 87.5%. Visual field mean deviation remained stable (mean change −0.79 dB; p = 0.21). Postoperative complications included macular edema (20%), transient diplopia (20%), choroidal detachment (12%), hyphema (4%), and one case of endophthalmitis (4%) with full visual recovery. Surgical reintervention was required in 2 eyes (8%).Conclusions PGI provided sustained IOP reduction with a favorable safety profile in a RUG population. These findings support the PGI as a valuable surgical option in UG, although larger multicenter comparative studies are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Larbi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: