Research develops a model to explain stagnant wages in Japan's dual labor market, indicating systemic issues.
Japan’s wages have remained stagnant despite improvements in productivity. This paper studies why wages have diverged from productivity by developing a search and matching model with heterogeneous workers: regular and non-regular. The simulated model accounts for a substantial part of the wage stagnation relative to productivity observed in Japan from 1996 to 2016. The results highlight labor market frictions that impede smooth transitions from regular to non-regular jobs. Over the past two decades, non-regular jobs have contributed more to output, but these frictions have distorted labor allocation. As a result, job seekers are heavily concentrated on non-regular positions, leading to a lack of wage growth for both regular and non-regular workers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ryutaro Kubo (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: