Investigates wildfire patterns and landscape changes in Tłı̨chǫ territory, highlighting the need for integrated approaches.
High-latitude regions are witnessing unprecedented wildfires and accelerated warming. This study explored wildfire patterns and land changes within the high-latitude Indigenous Tłı̨chǫ territory in the Northwest Territories, Canada. It used the Two-Eyed Seeing approach, which combines Western science, or Scientific Ecological Knowledge (SEK), with Indigenous knowledge, or Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK). This method integrated Earth observation data with insights from Tłı̨chǫ Elders and officials. We analyzed spatiotemporal variations in burned areas, land surface temperature (LST), albedo, snow cover, soil moisture, and land-cover types. A listening and storytelling session with community Elders provided an in-depth Indigenous perspective. Our findings indicate a concerning shift in wildfire activity on Tłı̨chǫ land, primarily driven by the interplay between climate change and land-cover changes. Land-cover estimates over the past fifteen years indicate that nearly half of the forested areas on Tłı̨chǫ-owned land have been converted to other land-cover types, with shrublands increasing twofold and grasslands expanding tenfold. We observed significant increases in spring and summer LSTs (p < 0.05), alongside decreases in precipitation and snow cover (p < 0.05), consistent with the Elders’ observations. The decline in topsoil moisture, coupled with rising temperatures, has triggered a positive feedback loop in forested areas, intensifying future wildfire risk. The study’s implications extend beyond the Tłı̨chǫ territory, suggesting a broader significance for climate resilience and Indigenous stewardship. It highlights the significance of place-based, integrated research for understanding complex wildfire behavior and land-cover transformations. The study indicates that the Two-Eyed Seeing approach, which weaves local Indigenous knowledge with quantitative Earth observations, not only improves analytical precision but also provides a collaborative framework for developing targeted strategies to mitigate the effects of increasingly severe fire regimes and land-cover changes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agrawal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: