Cross-sectional study compares feline stress and owner satisfaction in veterinary clinics, indicating benefits of segregation.
OBJECTIVES: This study compared veterinary clinics with and without designated feline-only areas or hours across four domains: feline stress during visits, handling and restraint techniques, owner education on preventive care and common diseases, and overall client satisfaction. METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted across eight clinics in Greater Lisbon, Portugal (November 2015-January 2016). In total, 204 cat owners completed a 37-question survey evaluating clinic experience, feline stress, owner education, and service quality. Respondents were divided based on whether their clinic offered feline-segregated areas or hours (n = 96) or not (n = 108). Data were analysed using Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests (p < 0.05), with effect sizes calculated via Cramér's V and rank-biserial correlation. RESULTS: Owners at non-segregated clinics reported greater difficulty removing cats from carriers (p = 0.034) and administering home medication (p = 0.040). Their cats were more frequently scruffed (18.4% vs 7.4%) or sedated (10.3% vs 2.5%; p = 0.046; Cramér's V = 0.24), with the presence of other species increasing perceived stress (p = 0.004; r = 0.21). Non-segregated clinic owners also received significantly less information regarding FeLV (42.6% vs 17.7% uninformed; p < 0.001), FIV (40.7% vs 15.6%; p < 0.001), flea prevention (27.8% vs 7.3%; p < 0.001), and deworming (21.3% vs 5.2%; p = 0.001). Satisfaction with staff and veterinarians was higher in the segregated group (p = 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Clinics utilizing designated feline-only spaces or hours demonstrated superior outcomes across all evaluated domains. These findings provide quantitative support for feline-friendly principles, suggesting that investing in species segregation, staff training, and client education yields tangible improvements in animal welfare, client relationships, and veterinary practice quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A Baltz (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: