Randomized trial demonstrates a structured approach to writing case reports in palliative care, highlighting practical steps for publication.
Case reports serve an important entry point for scholarship in palliative care (PC), yet many clinicians lack a practical roadmap for moving from an interesting encounter to a publishable article. In this inaugural article for the Journal of Palliative Medicine “Scholarly Skills Series,” we provide a concise, replicable framework for writing case reports with a PC lens. We focus on the PC adaptation of the CAse Report (CARE) guidelines while providing a structured three-phase framework. Organized into a “Before, During, After” structure, we outline key steps and common pitfalls, including selecting a publishable case, establishing authorship roles, obtaining informed consent, conducting a literature search, and framing the report using the CARE guidelines. We offer pragmatic guidance on article construction, journal targeting, submission logistics, and navigating revision, rejection, and resubmission. A summary table of “Do’s and Don’ts” highlights actionable practices to streamline the process and improve the likelihood of publication. This guide is designed for those seeking a standardized approach that supports academic development, team-based and trainee scholarship, and dissemination of clinically meaningful lessons in serious illness care to positively impact patient care outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: