Literature review analyzes anti-forensic applications and techniques in Android, highlighting challenges in mobile digital forensics.
The widespread adoption of Android devices and their open-source nature have led to increasingly sophisticated anti-forensic techniques. This literature review presents a comprehensive analysis of Android anti-forensics, focusing on the classification of techniques, the evaluation of anti-forensic applications, and the limitations of current forensic methodologies. Key strategies, such as data hiding, trail obfuscation, encryption, and artefact wiping, are examined alongside the forensic acquisition methods they aim to circumvent. The review also assesses the capabilities and constraints of widely used forensic tools, highlighting issues related to tool transparency, compatibility with modern Android versions, and support for encrypted or obfuscated data. Methodological shortcomings in the literature, such as inconsistent reporting of Android versions and device models, are identified as barriers to reproducibility and generalisability. Recommendations are provided to improve forensic access to private storage, enhance tool performance, and standardise research practices. This review contributes to a clearer understanding of the current state of Android anti-forensics and outlines priorities for future research and tool development in the field of mobile digital forensics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dowrick et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: