Tests torsion, bending, and shear failure in staggered beam-column joints, suggesting improvements in structural resilience.
Staggered-floor steel-reinforced concrete beam–column joints are extensively applied in turbine buildings of nuclear power plants to meet the requirements of spatial layout and pipeline arrangement. Such joints feature distinct geometric discontinuity and suffer additional torsion effects as well as asymmetric stress distribution when the middle column is lost, which greatly impairs the structural progressive collapse resistance. In this study, three 1/5-scale joint specimens, consisting of two staggered-floor steel-reinforced concrete joints and one reinforced concrete joint, were tested under vertical monotonic static loading. The failure pattern, deformation property, torsional performance, strain development and load-bearing mechanism were comprehensively analyzed. Finite element models considering the coupling effect of torsion, bending and shear were established and validated via ABAQUS. The test results show that the peak load-bearing capacities of the SRC-1, SRC-2, and RC specimens were 148.2 kN, 149.7 kN, and 69.3 kN, respectively. Compared with the RC specimen, the peak load-bearing capacity of the SRC specimens more than doubled, indicating that the embedded H-section steel can significantly improve the load-bearing capacity of staggered beam–column joints. However, when the staggered height distance was increased from 140 mm to 280 mm, the ultimate collapse displacement of the specimens decreased from 340 mm to 310 mm, indicating a reduction in deformation capacity. The finite element model reasonably reproduced the specimens’ primary load–displacement response and damage characteristics, with a peak load error of 8.93% for SRC-1. Finally, corresponding design recommendations are put forward for staggered-floor steel-reinforced concrete joints in nuclear power plant structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: