Retrospective cohort study evaluates reused electrodes’ safety and seizure outcomes in drug-resistant epilepsy, suggesting improved access to care.
Subdural grid implantation is essential for invasive intracranial electroencephalogram monitoring in drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), enabling accurate localization of epileptogenic zones and functional cortical mapping. However, the high cost of single-use electrodes limits access in resource-constrained settings. This study evaluated whether reuse of ethylene oxide (EO)-sterilized subdural grid electrodes is associated with increased postoperative infection risk or inferior seizure outcomes. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with DRE who underwent subdural grid implantation at a tertiary referral center between 2007 and 2025. Patients were categorized into single-use and EO-sterilized reused electrode groups. The primary outcome was postoperative infection within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included Engel seizure classification at 6 months and 1 year and procedure-related complications. A total of 1,148 patients were included (616 single-use and 532 reused). Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that reuse of subdural grid electrodes was not independently associated with postoperative infection (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37–1.01; p = 0.054). Longer operative time was independently associated with infection (adjusted OR: 1.22 per hour; 95% CI: 1.05–1.41; p = 0.010). Seizure outcomes at 6 months and 1 year were similar between groups (p = 0.802 at 1 year). Procedure-related complications did not differ significantly. EO-sterilized reused subdural grid electrodes are safe and effective when strict protocols are followed and may significantly improve access to epilepsy surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boontoterm et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: