Develops taurine-loaded nanoliposomes for improved wound healing, suggesting potential for better care.
Background: Taurine is a bioactive amino acid that has great potential for wound healing, but it struggles with poor skin penetration and quick clearance. This study aimed to develop taurine-loaded nanoliposomes (Nlp-Tau) to enable sustained local delivery and improve effectiveness. Methods: Nlp-Tau were prepared using thin-film hydration. We characterized them for size, charge, shape, encapsulation efficiency (EE%), loading efficiency (LE%), and in vitro release. Also, its biocompatibility on human foreskin fibroblasts (HFF) with a 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT assay) has been assessed. In vitro wound healing potential was further evaluated using a scratch assay. Results: Optimized Nlp-Tau showed favorable properties, including an average hydrodynamic diameter of about 282 nm, a polydispersity index of 0.2, a strong negative zeta potential of −31.3 mV, and a spherical shape. However, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images revealed diameters of about 142 nm and 194 nm for the drug-free and taurine-loaded particles, respectively. Additionally, EE% and LE% were 20% and 2.5%, respectively. In vitro release in PBS (pH 7.4) followed Higuchi kinetics, showing sustained release over 72 h. Nlp-Tau displayed excellent biocompatibility, with HFF viability significantly higher than other groups at concentrations up to 7 mg/mL. Importantly, in the scratch assay, Nlp-Tau treatment resulted in just 6.8% of the wound area remaining after 48 h, which outperformed free taurine at 10.7%. Conclusions: The Nlp-Tau system we developed offers a stable, biocompatible, and effective delivery method for sustained taurine release. It demonstrates greatly improved in vitro wound closure and shows strong potential for future wound care applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jirehnezhadyan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: