Randomized trial assesses carbon capture and species diversity in urban green spaces, suggesting priorities for urban planning.
Quantitative characterization of urban forest structures remains under-researched in rapidly expanding Indonesian cities. The research assesses taxonomic diversity and carbon capture in 87 sampling plots in Yogyakarta. Sixty-five species were recorded, and total carbon stock was 87.95 Mg-C ha−1 (322.77 Mg-CO2 ha−1). There was strong spatial inequality in carbon distribution; although there were strong centers of biomass carbon distribution in public green belts and heritage zones, the private sector controlled a substantial proportion of the total biomass. The abundance of aboveground biomass (AGB) was highly right-skewed, and the sequestration capacity of the city was dominated by a small group of species referred to as foundation species, namely Samanea saman (357.67 Mg-CO2 ha−1). We demonstrate that there is clear decoupling between diversity and productivity, with the Shannon index (H′) and Simpson index (D) showing weak and non-significant relationships with AGB, while basal area proved to be a strong predictor (R2 = 0.936). According to these outcomes, the structural maturity and the size of individual trees in Yogyakarta are the primary determinants of carbon storage capacity rather than species richness. Large-diameter tree cohorts should therefore be prioritized in urban mitigation strategies compared to mere horizontal expansion of green cover.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adiyatma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: