Bibliometric analysis maps the rapid growth and key themes of Generative AI in geography, indicating significant research gaps.
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is increasingly applied across geographic research, yet existing studies remain fragmented and lack a field-level synthesis. This study addresses this gap through a bibliometric analysis of 891 peer-reviewed journal articles published between 2022 and 2025 and indexed in Scopus. The results indicate a rapid expansion of GenAI-related geographical research following the diffusion of large language models, alongside strong spatial concentration in a small number of countries and institutions. Five major research themes are identified, including LLM-based GeoAI and GIS workflows, Earth observation and remote sensing, knowledge-driven urban analytics, educational and scholarly communication contexts, and tool-oriented geospatial platforms. Temporal patterns suggest a shift from early exploratory studies toward workflow-level integration. Highly cited contributions concentrate in education, remote sensing, and GIScience, while intellectual foundations draw on both foundational AI architectures and long-standing geographic measurement and modeling. By providing a systematic and large-scale mapping of the structure and evolution of GenAI in geography, this study extends beyond existing narrative and application-focused reviews and offers an integrated account of the field’s development. It also identifies key research gaps for future research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: